4.6 Article

Petroleum-Degrading Fungal Isolates for the Treatment of Soil Microcosms

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11051351

关键词

single culture; fungal consortium; bioaugmentation; GC-MS; PAH-contaminated soil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to degrade total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from contaminated soil using batch microcosm reactors. Soil fungi isolated from the same polluted soil and ligninolytic fungal strains were applied in the treatment of soil-contaminated microcosms under aerobic conditions. Different fungal strains were used for bioaugmentation in mono or co-cultures. The results showed that six fungal isolates exhibited petroleum-degrading potential, with Paecilomyces formosus showing the highest TPH degradation rate of 97%.
The main purpose of this study was to degrade total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from contaminated soil in batch microcosm reactors. Native soil fungi isolated from the same petroleum-polluted soil and ligninolytic fungal strains were screened and applied in the treatment of soil-contaminated microcosms in aerobic conditions. The bioaugmentation processes were carried out using selected hydrocarbonoclastic fungal strains in mono or co-cultures. Results demonstrated the petroleum-degrading potential of six fungal isolates, namely KBR1 and KBR8 (indigenous) and KBR1-1, KB4, KB2 and LB3 (exogenous). Based on the molecular and phylogenetic analysis, KBR1 and KB8 were identified as Aspergillus niger [MW699896] and tubingensis [MW699895], while KBR1-1, KB4, KB2 and LB3 were affiliated with the genera Syncephalastrum sp. [MZ817958], Paecilomyces formosus [MW699897], Fusarium chlamydosporum [MZ817957] and Coniochaeta sp. [MW699893], respectively. The highest rate of TPH degradation was recorded in soil microcosm treatments (SMT) after 60 days by inoculation with Paecilomyces formosus 97 +/- 2.54%, followed by bioaugmentation with the native strain Aspergillus niger (92 +/- 1.83%) and then by the fungal consortium (84 +/- 2.21%). The statistical analysis of the results showed significant differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据