4.6 Article

tilS and rpoB: New Molecular Markers for Phylogenetic and Biodiversity Studies of the Genus Thiothrix

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102521

关键词

Thiothrix; genome; MAG; tilS; rpoB; set of bacterial core genes; ANI; phylogeny; colorless filamentous bacteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes the use of tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthase (tilS) and beta subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB) genes as phylogenetic markers for the genus Thiothrix. Taxonomic analysis using these genes showed that MK1 and WS belong to Thiothrix lacustris, while DNT52, DNT53, and H33 belong to Thiothrix subterranea. High-throughput sequencing of tilS gene fragments revealed the presence of new Thiothrix species.
Currently, the phylogeny of the genus Thiothrix is based on comparative whole genome analysis because of the high homology of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences within the genus. We analyzed the possibility of using various conservative genes as phylogenetic markers for the genus Thiothrix. We found that the levels of similarity of the nucleotide sequences of the tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthase (tilS) and the beta subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB) genes are in good agreement with the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between the genomes of various representatives of the genus Thiothrix. The genomes of Thiothrix strains MK1, WS, DNT52, DNT53, and H33 were sequenced. Taxonomic analysis using both whole genomes and the tilS gene consistently showed that MK1 and WS belong to Thiothrix lacustris, while DNT52, DNT53, and H33 belong to Thiothrix subterranea. The tilS gene fragments were subjected to high-throughput sequencing to profile the Thiothrix mat of a sulfidic spring, which revealed the presence of known species of Thiothrix and new species-level phylotypes. Thus, the use of tilS and rpoB as phylogenetic markers will allow for rapid analyses of pure cultures and natural communities for the purpose of phylogenetic identification of representatives of the genus Thiothrix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据