4.6 Article

Impact of the new membrane-targeting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic MCC5145 on the treatment of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia in mice

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04459-22

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; pneumococcus; pneumonia; immunocompromised hosts; lipoglycopeptide; bioluminescence; antimicrobial agents; bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the efficacy of MCC5145 in treating bacteremic pneumonia and found that it can reduce the bacterial burden in the lungs and blood in a mouse model. These findings support the further development of MCC5145 as a potential new treatment option for pneumonia and/or bacteremic pneumonia in clinical settings, particularly for immunocompromised individuals.
Bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia is one of the most severe forms of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and with particularly high case-fatality rates among the elderly and individuals with comorbidities, exacerbated by rising antibiotic resistance and time to initiation of therapy. Here, we examined the efficacy of the preclinical vancapticin glycopeptide MCC5145 against fulminant infection by S. pneumoniae serotype 2 strain D39 in a bioluminescent, neutropenic mouse model of bacteremic pneumonia. MCC5145 is a semisynthetic vancomycin derivative chemically modified at the C-terminus with a membrane-targeting motif designed to preferentially bind the anionic bacterial surface. We show that similar to vancomycin, subcutaneous administration of MCC5145 to mice 1 day after intranasal infection with a bioluminescent derivative of S. pneumoniae D39 elicited time and concentration-dependent reduction in total flux in the lungs and blood. Together, our finding supports the further development of MCC5145 as a potential new treatment option for pneumonia and/or bacteremic pneumonia in clinical settings, particularly for immunocompromised individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据