4.7 Article

Self-configuring programmable silicon photonic filter for integrated microwave photonic processors

期刊

APL PHOTONICS
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0169544

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an optimization technique for a fully tunable ring-assisted Mach-Zehnder interferometer filter. The proposed filter design has exceptional reconfigurability, allowing for different filter architectures and flexible filtering requirements.
Reconfigurable photonic filters show great promise as a potential solution to meet the evolving needs of future microwave communication systems. By integrating high-performance filters into programmable microwave photonic processors, they can provide significant benefits for signal processing applications. The development of an algorithm that can automatically characterize and reconfigure the filter using a single optical input and output port is essential for this purpose. This paper presents an optimization technique for a fully tunable ring-assisted Mach-Zehnder interferometer filter. The proposed filter design eliminates the need for monitoring components and employs a novel algorithm that operates independently in each ring by switching between the two arms of the filter. In addition, the filter can be configured to implement different filter architectures, allowing for flexible filtering requirements. Measurements were performed using the device as an interleaver, implementing different types of infinite impulse response filters in the optical and radio frequency domains. Side-coupled integrated spaced sequence of resonator filters were also implemented by reconfiguring the same device. These results demonstrate the exceptional reconfigurability of the filter design proposed herein in terms of bandwidth and central frequency.(c) 2023 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据