4.7 Article

Effect of Phytate (InsP6) and Other Inositol-Phosphates (InsP5, InsP4, InsP3, InsP2) on Crystallization of Calcium Oxalate, Brushite, and Hydroxyapatite

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom13071061

关键词

renal lithiasis; phytate; lower inositol phosphates; crystallization inhibitors; calcium oxalate; calcium phosphates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of phytate on the crystallization of calcium oxalate, hydroxyapatite and brushite in artificial urine. The results showed that all lower InsPs seemed to inhibit the crystallization of calcium salts, especially InsP6 and InsP5 for calcium oxalate, and InsP5 and InsP4 for brushite. However, phytate had weak effects on the crystallization of hydroxyapatite in vitro, indicating a different mechanism for its in vivo crystallization.
Pathological calcifications may consist of calcium oxalate (CaOx), hydroxyapatite (HAP), and brushite (BRU). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of phytate (inositol hexakisphosphate, InsP6), InsP6 hydrolysates, and individual lower InsPs (InsP5, InsP4, InsP3, and InsP2) on the crystallization of CaOx, HAP and BRU in artificial urine. All of the lower InsPs seem to inhibit the crystallization of calcium salts in biological fluids, although our in vitro results showed that InsP6 and InsP5 were stronger inhibitors of CaOx crystallization, and InsP5 and InsP4 were stronger inhibitors of BRU crystallization. For the specific in vitro experimental conditions we examined, the InsPs had very weak effects on HAP crystallization, although it is likely that a different mechanism is responsible for HAP crystallization in vivo. For example, calciprotein particles seem to have an important role in the formation of cardiovascular calcifications in vivo. The experimental conditions that we examined partially reproduced the in vivo conditions of CaOx and BRU crystallization, but not the in vivo conditions of HAP crystallization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据