4.7 Article

Predicting COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Confidence and Uptake in the United States

期刊

VACCINES
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11101597

关键词

vaccination; COVID-19; influenza; reasoned action; integrated behavioral model; Tobit regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates and compares the predictors of COVID-19 and influenza vaccination confidence and uptake, and examines the differences in predictors between the two diseases. The findings provide valuable insights for intervention strategies and message designs.
This study investigates and compares the predictors of COVID-19 and influenza vaccination confidence and uptake in the U.S. Vaccine hesitancy is defined as the reluctance or refusal (i.e., less than 100% behavioral intention) to vaccinate despite the availability of effective and safe vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is a major obstacle in the fight against infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and influenza. Predictors of vaccination intention are identified using the reasoned action approach and the integrated behavioral model. Data from two national samples (N = 1131 for COVID-19 and N = 1126 for influenza) were collected from U.S. Qualtrics panels. Tobit regression models were estimated to predict percentage increases in vaccination intention (i.e., confidence) and the probability of vaccination uptake (i.e., intention reaching 100%). The results provided evidence for the reasoned approach and the IBM model and showed that the predictors followed different patterns for COVID-19 and influenza. The implications for intervention strategies and message designs were discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据