4.7 Article

Parents' Uptake and Willingness towards Recommended Vaccinations for Their Children with Underlying Chronic Medical Conditions in Italy

期刊

VACCINES
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091423

关键词

children; chronic condition; Italy; uptake; vaccinations; willingness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the willingness and uptake of recommended vaccinations among parents of children with chronic medical conditions in Italy. It finds that only 34.9% of the sample received all vaccinations and only 17.9% were willing to vaccinate their child. Factors influencing vaccination include physician recommendations, age, education level, and information sources.
This cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the willingness and uptake of recommended vaccinations against influenza, meningococcal B and ACWY, pneumococcal, rotavirus and the influencing factors among 565 parents of children aged 6 months to 5 years with chronic medical conditions in Italy. Only 34.9% of the sample received all vaccinations. Parents whose selected child was vaccinated against the five diseases were those who had received recommendations from physicians, who did not believe that children should get fewer vaccinations at the same time, those whose child was aged 2-3 and 4-5 years compared to 6 months-1 year, and those who acquired information from physicians. Only 17.9% were willing to vaccinate their child. Parents with a university degree, those who acquired information from physicians, and those whose child had a more recent diagnosis were more likely to be willing to vaccinate their child. Parents who believed that children should get fewer vaccines at the same time, those without a university degree, and those who did not acquire information from physicians were more likely to not have vaccinated their child because they were concerned about vaccines' side effects. Public health policymakers should provide efforts to promote the uptake for an adequate protection of this high-risk group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据