4.7 Article

High variation across E. coli hybrid isolates identified in metabolism-related biological pathways co-expressed with virulent genes

期刊

GUT MICROBES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2228042

关键词

E; coli; EPEC; ETEC; WGCNA; enrichment analysis; differential expression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By analyzing RNA-seq data of three pathogenic E. coli hybrid isolates, researchers have identified differences in gene interactions caused by different virulent factors, especially in metabolism-related biological pathways. This suggests potential variations in resource allocation or energy generation among these isolates based on genomic variation.
Virulent genes present in Escherichia coli (E. coli) can cause significant human diseases. These enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) isolates with virulent genes show different expression levels when grown under diverse laboratory conditions. In this research, we have performed differential gene expression analysis using publicly available RNA-seq data on three pathogenic E. coli hybrid isolates in an attempt to characterize the variation in gene interactions that are altered by the presence or absence of virulent factors within the genome. Almost 26.7% of the common genes across these strains were found to be differentially expressed. Out of the 88 differentially expressed genes with virulent factors identified from PATRIC, nine were common in all these strains. A combination of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis and Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis reveals significant differences in gene co-expression involving virulent genes common among the three investigated strains. The co-expression pattern is observed to be especially variable among biological pathways involving metabolism-related genes. This suggests a potential difference in resource allocation or energy generation across the three isolates based on genomic variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据