4.7 Editorial Material

The future of academic publishing

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Measuring societal impact: how to go beyond standard publication metrics

Chris Woolston

NATURE (2023)

News Item Multidisciplinary Sciences

PEER REVIEW NEEDS A RADICAL RETHINK

Amber Dance

NATURE (2023)

Review Psychology, Biological

The past, present and future of Registered Reports

Christopher D. Chambers et al.

Summary: Registered Reports were introduced a decade ago to improve the rigour and credibility of confirmatory research by peer reviewing study proposals before research is undertaken. While they are not a universal solution for irreproducibility, early evidence suggests that Registered Reports are working as intended and are promoting reproducibility, transparency, and self-correction across disciplines. The policies and practices surrounding Registered Reports are evolving to address limitations and adapt to new challenges.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2022)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Stop misusing data when hiring academics

Cameron Neylon

NATURE (2022)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Article-processing charges weaken open access

Juan Pablo Alperin

Summary: The payment method used by the global north inhibits public and scholar-led publishing efforts in Latin America.

NATURE (2022)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Turning the tide of parachute science

Paris V. Stefanoudis et al.

CURRENT BIOLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Predatory publishers' latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers

Kyle Siler et al.

NATURE (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice

Geoff Frampton et al.

Summary: The retraction process of Covid-19 research articles is inconsistent and ambiguous, with more than half of retracted articles remaining available from a wide range of online sources. There is an urgent need to improve guidance on the retraction process and to extend this to cover preprint servers.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Review Ethics

A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review

Balazs Aczel et al.

Summary: The study estimated the time and monetary value of researchers' peer review work, pointing out that the current labor is under-recognized and alternative structures and payment methods are important to consider. The results show the significant amount of work and time researchers dedicate to the publication system, highlighting the need for alternative models to enhance the benefits of peer review.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2021)

Article Psychology

A Guide to Posting and Managing Preprints

Hannah Moshontz et al.

Summary: This guide aims to assist psychological scientists in posting preprints, with a review of terminology, historical and legal overview, as well as specific recommendations including posting complete and proofread preprints, using dedicated servers, and keeping the preprints updated with proper licensing.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Easing Into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors

Ummul-Kiram Kathawalla et al.

Summary: This article provides a roadmap for graduate students and their advisors to engage in open science practices, suggesting eight practices for novice graduate students to adopt and addressing concerns about not knowing how to engage.

COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2021)

Article Psychology

An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports

Anne M. Scheel et al.

Summary: Selective publishing of positive results may distort the evidence for scientific claims. A comparison between Registered Reports (RRs) and standard literature in psychology reveals a significant difference in the proportion of positive results, suggesting a reduction in publication bias and/or Type I error inflation in RR literature.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)

News Item Multidisciplinary Sciences

POPULAR PREPRINT SITES FACE CLOSURE BECAUSE OF MONEY TROUBLES

Smriti Mallapaty

NATURE (2020)

Article Economics

Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?

Nicholas Bloom et al.

AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2020)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates

Richard Sever et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2019)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Advocating against exclusion of Francophones in global health research

Anne Roca et al.

LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH (2019)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Plan S: don't ignore Latin America

Humberto Debat et al.

NATURE (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Agnes Grudniewicz et al.

NATURE (2019)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Why do authors publish in predatory journals?

Serhat Kurt

LEARNED PUBLISHING (2018)

Article Psychology, Biological

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Colin F. Camerer et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Stop this waste of people, animals and money

David Moher et al.

NATURE (2017)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: A stalled process?

Christos Mammides et al.

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (2016)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

A tragedy of errors

David B. Allison et al.

NATURE (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics

Colin F. Camerer et al.

SCIENCE (2016)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Iran, science, and collaboration

Mohammad Farhadi

SCIENCE (2015)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Firm action needed on predatory journals

Jocalyn Clark et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Firm action needed on predatory journals

Jocalyn Clark et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

Vincent Lariviere et al.

PLOS ONE (2015)

Review Neurosciences

Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank

Bjoern Brembs et al.

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE (2013)

Review Computer Science, Information Systems

Bias in peer review

Carole J. Lee et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact

Brian Uzzi et al.

SCIENCE (2013)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data

Tal Yarkoni et al.

NATURE METHODS (2011)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Sara Schroter et al.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2008)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

Neal S. Young et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2008)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Why most published research findings are false

JPA Ioannidis

PLOS MEDICINE (2005)