4.8 Article

iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes reveal abnormal TGF-β signalling in left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1031-1042

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3411

关键词

-

资金

  1. Neuroscience Microscopy Service (NMS)
  2. FACS Core at the Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University
  3. Uehara Memorial Foundation Research Fellowship
  4. American Heart Association [15POST25160016, 15POST22940013]
  5. NIH [K99HL130416, K18 HL11708301, R01 HL113006, R01 HL130020, R01 126527, R01 128170, R01 HL123968, R24 HL117756]
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan
  7. National Institutes of Health [P01 GM099130]
  8. Children's Cardiomyopathy Foundation
  9. AHA Established Investigator Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) is the third most prevalent cardiomyopathy in children and its pathogenesis has been associated with the developmental defect of the embryonic myocardium. We show that patient-specific induced pluripotent stem Cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) generated from LVNC patients carrying a mutation in the cardiac transcription factor TBX20 recapitulate a key aspect of the pathological phenotype at the single-cell level and this was associated with perturbed transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signalling. LVNC iPSC-CMs have decreased proliferative capacity due to abnormal activation of TGF-beta signalling, TBX20 regulates the expression of TGF-beta signalling modifiers including one known to be a genetic cause of LVNC, PRDM16, and genome editing of PRDM16 caused proliferation defects in iPSC-CMs. Inhibition of TGF-beta signalling and genome correction of the TBX20 mutation were sufficient to reverse the disease phenotype. Our study demonstrates that iPSC-CMs are a useful tool for the exploration of pathological mechanisms underlying poorly understood cardiomyopathies including LVNC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据