4.8 Article

Co-ChIP enables genome-wide mapping of histone mark co-occurrence at single-molecule resolution

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 953-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3652

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [309788]
  2. Israel Science foundation [782/11]
  3. BLUEPRINT FP7 consortium
  4. Ernest and Bonnie Beutler Research Program of Excellence in Genomic Medicine
  5. Minerva Stiftung research grant
  6. National Human Genome Research Institute Center for Excellence in Genome Science [1P50HG006193]
  7. Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology and Space
  8. David and Fela Shapell Family Foundation
  9. Abramson Family Center for Young Scientists
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [309788] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone modifications play an important role in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation, but despite the large amount of genome-wide histone modification data collected in different cells and tissues, little is known about co-occurrence of modifications on the same nucleosome. Here we present a genome-wide quantitative method for combinatorial indexed chromatin immunoprecipitation (co-ChIP) to characterize co-occurrence of histone modifications on nucleosomes. Using co-ChIP, we study the genome-wide co-occurrence of 14 chromatin marks (70 pairwise combinations), and find previously undescribed co-occurrence patterns, including the co-occurrence of H3K9me1 and H3K27ac in super-enhancers. Finally, we apply co-ChIP to measure the distribution of the bivalent H3K4me3-H3K27me3 domains in two distinct mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) states and in four adult tissues. We observe dynamic changes in 5,786 regions and discover both loss and de novo gain of bivalency in key tissue-specific regulatory genes, suggesting a functional role for bivalent domains during different stages of development. These results show that co-ChIP can reveal the complex interactions between histone modifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据