4.7 Article

Evaluation and Modelling of Reference Evapotranspiration Using Different Machine Learning Techniques for a Brazilian Tropical Savanna

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13082056

关键词

Pantanal; climate change; combination; artificial intelligence; artificial neural networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meteorological elements have significant impacts on the environment, cultures, and climate change. By studying the meteorological variables in the Brazilian Pantanal, this research demonstrated the effectiveness of artificial intelligence in improving environmental modeling, reducing costs, and increasing reliability. Various machine learning techniques were compared, resulting in a new model that accurately describes reference evapotranspiration with fewer climatic variables.
Meteorological elements can affect the environment and cultures differently and may alter the natural development process contributing significantly to climate change. Meteorological variables of the Brazilian Pantanal were studied and used to determine evapotranspiration with fewer variables. It was found that artificial intelligence can substantially improve environmental modeling when alternative prediction techniques are used, resulting in lower project costs and more reliable results. This work tried to find the best combination by comparing machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks, random forests, and support vector machines. A new model was created that depends on fewer climatic variables compared to the Penman-Monteith method (the standard method for estimating reference evapotranspiration) and can efficiently describe the reference evapotranspiration. Machine learning techniques are highly efficient for modeling environmental systems since they can process large amounts of data and find the best interactions between the parameters involved. In addition, more than 98% accuracy was obtained using fewer variables compared to the standard method when artificial neural networks are utilized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据