4.7 Article

Characterization of the CLE Family in Three Nicotiana Species and Potential Roles of CLE Peptides in Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13061480

关键词

CLE family; peptide signal; tobacco; abiotic stress; osmotic stress; salinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The CLE family of small secreted proteins plays important roles in plant development and stress responses. In this study, 84 members of the CLE family were identified in tobacco and related species. These CLE members formed 9 subgroups and several of them showed induced expression upon abiotic stress treatments. Synthetic peptides of some CLEs were also found to enhance tobacco's tolerance to osmotic and salinity stresses.
The CLE family (CLAVATA3/embryo surrounding region-related), a class of small secreted proteins, play important roles in plant development and stress responses. Members of the CLE family have been characterized in a number of plant species, including Arabidopsis and rice. However, limited information is available about CLE peptides in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and related Nicotiana species. Here we report the identification of 84 CLE family members in three Nicotiana species based on sequence similarity. The newly identified CLE members, including 41 from N. tabacum, 19 from N. sylvestris, and 24 from N. tomentosiformis, together with 32 CLEs from Arabidopsis and 52 CLEs from tomato, formed 9 subgroups in a phylogenic tree. The unbalanced distribution of the Nicotiana CLEs in the subgroups suggested potential preferential gene family expansion during evolution. Expression of the NtCLE genes was analyzed and a number of the NtCLEs showed induced expression upon abiotic stress treatments. Synthetic peptides of several NtCLEs, when applied to detached tobacco leaf discs, were able to increase plants' tolerance to osmotic and salinity stresses, suggesting potential roles of CLE peptides in the stress responses of tobacco.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据