4.5 Article

Influence of microwave pretreatment on the total phenolics, antioxidant activity, moisture diffusivity, and rehydration rate of dried sweet cherry

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3703

关键词

antioxidant capacity; Fick law; Gallic acid equivalents; Midilli equation; total phenolics content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of microwave pretreatments on sweet cherries. The results showed that microwave pretreatment reduced drying time, increased total phenolics content and antioxidant capacity, and enhanced rehydration rate of dried cherries.
The target of this work was to investigate the influence of microwave pretreatments (at five levels of 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 s) on the total phenolics content, antioxidant potential, mass transfer rate, effective moisture diffusivity (D-eff), and rehydration rate of sweet cherries (SC). The drying duration of microwave-treated SC was shorter than the untreated sample. The average drying time of fresh SC microwaved for 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 s were 220, 205, 190, 175, and 150 min, respectively. The D-eff values, total phenolics, and antioxidant capacity of microwave-treated SC were higher than the untreated sample. In this study, the SC D-eff as determined by the second Fick law varied from 8.73 x 10(-10) to 1.41 x 10(-9) m(2)/s. The experimental data for the dehydration curves were fitted to different thin-layer equations, and the Midilli equation using the experimental constants best described the drying rate of SC. As the microwave pretreatment time increased from 0 to 120 s, the total phenolics and antioxidant capacity of dried SC increased from 1491.4 mu g Gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g dry to 2272.1 mu g GAE/g dry, and 54.47%-62.59% (p <.05). The microwave pretreatment enhanced the rehydration rate of dried SC. The rehydration percent of dried SC microwaved for 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 s were 127.27%, 136.63%, 136.91%, 137.07%, and 136.72%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据