4.5 Article

To what extent can smart contracts replace traditional contracts in construction project?

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2023-0379

关键词

Construction project management; Construction industry; Contract management; Smart contract; Blockchain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to discuss the obstructing clauses in real-world contracts and analyze the technical and economic feasibility of transforming contract clauses into executable codes. Through inductive content analysis and speculative analysis, the study identifies the flexibility clauses in traditional contracts and explores different methods to transform these clauses into computer languages.
PurposeThe smart contract provides an opportunity to improve existing contract management practices in the construction projects by replacing traditional contracts. However, translating the contracts into computer languages is considered a major challenge which has not been investigated. Thus, it is necessary to: (1) identify the obstructing clauses in real-world contracts; and (2) analyze the replacement's technical and economic feasibility. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned objectives.Design/methodology/approachThis study identified the flexibility clauses of traditional contracts and their corresponding functions through inductive content analysis with representative standard contracts as materials. Through a speculative analysis in accordance to design science paradigm and new institutional economics, the economic and technical feasibility of existing approaches, including enumeration method, fuzzy algorithm, rough sets theory, machine learning and artificial intelligence, to transform respective clauses (functions) into executable codes are analyzed.FindingsThe clauses of semantic flexibility and structural flexibility are identified from the contracts. The transformation of semantic flexibility is economically and/or technically infeasible with existing methods and materials. But with more data as materials and methods of rough sets or machine learning, the transformation can be feasible. The transformation of structural flexibility is technically possible however economically unacceptable.Practical implicationsGiven smart contracts' inability to provide the required flexibility for construction projects, smart contracts will be more effective in less relational contracts. For construction contracts, the combination of smart contracts and traditional contracts is recommended. In the long run, with the sharing or trading of data in the industry level and the integration of machine learning or artificial intelligence reducing relevant costs, the automation of contract management can be achieved.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the understanding of the smart contract's limitations in industry scenarios and its role in construction project management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据