4.7 Article

The Distribution of IgT mRNA+ Cells in the Gut of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.)

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13203191

关键词

Atlantic salmon; gut; IgT; pIgR; in situ hybridization; mucosal immunity; vaccination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the distribution of IgT and pIgR mRNA(+) cells in the gut of Atlantic salmon was investigated using RNAscope in situ hybridization. The results showed that the distribution of IgT mRNA(+) cells is region-specific and varies with fish age, while intraperitoneal vaccination had no significant impact on the number of IgT(+) transcripts.
The newly discovered IgT(+) B cell is thought to play a dominant role in mucosal immunity, but limited studies have examined its distribution in fish species, hindering our understanding of its function. This study investigated IgT and poly Ig receptor (pIgR) mRNA(+) cell distribution in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) gut using RNAscope in situ hybridization (ISH) and assessed the effects of vaccination. The pyloric caeca, mid-intestine (first and second parts), and posterior segment in two weight stages (Group 1: avg. 153 g, Group 2: avg. 1717 g) were examined in both vaccinated and unvaccinated fish. ISH revealed more IgT mRNA(+) cells in the second part of the midgut compared to other intestinal segments, as well as a higher number of positive cells in Group 2 (older fish). In line with previous findings, intraperitoneal vaccination had no significant impact on the number of IgT(+) transcripts. IgT mRNA(+) cells were found mostly in the lamina propria and near capillaries, while pIgR was registered in both the lamina propria and mucosa. Interestingly, vaccinated fish presented adhesions and granulomatous tissue in the peritoneum, with both IgT and pIgR mRNA(+) cells. Taken together, these results suggest that the distribution of IgT mRNA(+) cells in the intestine of Atlantic salmon is region-specific and is not affected by intraperitoneal vaccination but varies with fish age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据