4.7 Article

The Spatial Distribution of Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever and Its Potential Vectors in Europe and Beyond

期刊

INSECTS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/insects14090771

关键词

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever; CCHF; disease risk mapping; ticks; Hyalomma; global health; spatial modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is spreading globally, with new cases reported in many countries. The authors updated the CCHF distribution map to include global disease occurrence records up to June 2022, and added the recent records for Europe. The study shows the environmental suitability for the disease in Europe, helping to identify high-risk areas and target mitigation measures.
Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is considered to be spreading across the globe, with many countries reporting new human CCHF cases in recent decades including Georgia, Turkiye, Albania, and, most recently, Spain. We update a human CCHF distribution map produced in 2015 to include global disease occurrence records to June 2022, and we include the recent records for Europe. The predicted distributions are based on long-established spatial modelling methods and are extended to include all European countries and the surrounding areas. The map produced shows the environmental suitability for the disease, taking into account the distribution of the most important known and potential tick vectors Hyalomma marginatum and Hyalomma lusitanicum, without which the disease cannot occur. This limits the disease's predicted distribution to the Iberian Peninsula, the Mediterranean seaboard, along with Turkiye and the Caucasus, with a more patchy suitability predicted for inland Greece, the southern Balkans, and extending north to north-west France and central Europe. These updated CCHF maps can be used to identify the areas with the highest probability of disease and to therefore target areas where mitigation measures should currently be focused.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据