4.8 Article

Lightwave-driven quasiparticle collisions on a subcycle timescale

期刊

NATURE
卷 533, 期 7602, 页码 225-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature17958

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [305003]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HU 1598/2-1, GRK 1570, SFB 1083, SPP 1840, KI 917/2-2, KI 917/3-1]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR 1405964]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1405964] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ever since Ernest Rutherford scattered alpha-particles from gold foils(1), collision experiments have revealed insights into atoms, nuclei and elementary particles(2). In solids, many-body correlations lead to characteristic resonances(3)-called quasiparticles-such as excitons, dropletons(4), polarons and Cooper pairs. The structure and dynamics of quasiparticles are important because they define macroscopic phenomena such as Mott insulating states, spontaneous spin-and charge-order, and high-temperature superconductivity(5). However, the extremely short lifetimes of these entities(6) make practical implementations of a suitable collider challenging. Here we exploit lightwave-driven charge transport(7-24), the foundation of attosecond science(9-13), to explore ultrafast quasiparticle collisions directly in the time domain: a femtosecond optical pulse creates excitonic electron-hole pairs in the layered dichalcogenide tungsten diselenide while a strong terahertz field accelerates and collides the electrons with the holes. The underlying dynamics of the wave packets, including collision, pair annihilation, quantum interference and dephasing, are detected as light emission in high-order spectral sidebands(17-19) of the optical excitation. A full quantum theory explains our observations microscopically. This approach enables collision experiments with various complex quasiparticles and suggests a promising new way of generating sub-femtosecond pulses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据