4.6 Article

Accelerating Bayesian Estimation of Solar Cell Equivalent Circuit Parameters Using JAX-Based Sampling

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12173631

关键词

solar cell; equivalent circuit model; parameter extraction; Bayesian estimation; Roberts g-function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Equivalent circuit models are important tools in understanding and designing solar cells. This paper presents a method to accelerate the computation of Bayesian estimation of equivalent circuit parameters by upgrading the statistical package PyMC to its latest version PyMC 4, which supports the use of JAX. The acceleration effect of JAX is remarkable, achieving a calculation time of less than 1/20 times that of the previous method.
Equivalent circuit models that reproduce the current-voltage characteristics of solar cells are useful not only to gain physical insight into the power loss mechanisms that take place in solar cells but also for designing systems that use renewable solar energy as a power source. As mentioned in a previous paper, Bayesian estimation of equivalent circuit parameters avoids the drawbacks of nonlinear least-squares methods, such as the possibility of evaluating estimation errors. However, it requires a long computation time because the estimated values are obtained by sampling using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. In this paper, a trial to accelerate the calculation by upgrading the Bayesian statistical package PyMC is presented. PyMC ver. 4, the next version of PyMC3 used in the previous paper, started to support the latest sampling libraries using a machine learning framework JAX, in addition to PyMC-specific methods. The acceleration effect of JAX is remarkable, achieving a calculation time of less than 1/20 times that of the case without JAX. Recommended calculation conditions were disclosed based on the results of a number of trials, and a demonstration with testable Python code on Google Colaboratory using the recommended conditions is published on GitHub.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据