4.6 Article

Numerical Study on the Separation Performance of Hydrocyclones with Different Secondary Cylindrical Section Diameters

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11092542

关键词

hydrocyclone; secondary-cylindrical section; particle circulation flow; separation performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the regulation of particle circulation flow in hydrocyclones by changing the diameter of the secondary-cylindrical section to optimize separation efficiency. The results show that circulation flows are induced by the axial velocity wave zone, and increasing the secondary-cylindrical section diameter intensifies coarse particle circulation and aggregation, resulting in an increase of cut size. Adjusting the secondary-cylindrical section diameter helps improve classification efficiency and enhance separation sharpness.
The particle motion behavior in hydrocyclones has received increasing attention, but the particle circulation flow has received relatively limited attention. In this paper, the particle circulation flow is regulated by changing the secondary-cylindrical section diameter to optimize the separation effect. The effects of secondary-cylindrical section diameters on flow field characteristics and separation performance are explored using the two-fluid model (TFM). The findings demonstrate that particle circulation flows are ubiquitous in the secondary-cylindrical hydrocyclone and are induced by the axial velocity wave zone. The increase in the secondary-cylindrical section diameter intensifies the coarse particle circulation and aggrandizes the coarse particle's aggregation degree and aggregation region, leading to an increment in cut size. The circulation flow component can be regulated by adjusting the secondary-cylindrical section, thus improving the classification effect. An appropriate diameter of the secondary-cylindrical section facilitates improved particle circulation, strengthening the separation sharpness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据