4.6 Article

Liquid-Liquid Two-Phase Flow and Size Prediction of Slug Droplets in Microchannels

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11082390

关键词

microchannels; downstream orifice; two-phase flow; droplet; size prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liquid-liquid two-phase flow and size prediction of slug droplets in microchannels with varying orifice sizes downstream were assessed through experiments. Aqueous glycerol and mineral oil with surfactant were used as the dispersed and continuous phases, respectively. Three characteristic flow patterns were observed, and flow region changes with orifice size were documented. Universal flow pattern maps and slug droplet formation regions were established, and prediction correlations for droplet sizes were developed and validated experimentally.
The liquid-liquid two-phase flow and size prediction of slug droplets in flow-focusing microchannels with different downstream orifice sizes were investigated experimentally. Aqueous solution of 50%-glycerol and mineral oil with 4 wt.% surfactant sorbitanlauric acid ester (Span 20) were used as the dispersed and continuous phases, respectively. Three characteristic flow patterns were identified: slug flow, dripping flow, and jetting flow. The slug flow region decreased but the jetting flow region increased with the decrease in the size of the channel orifice. Afterwards, the universal flow pattern maps of the liquid-liquid two-phase in three microchannels were obtained based on dimensionless analysis. Furthermore, two slug droplet formation regions were found: when f(-1)Ca(c) < 0.01, the droplet formation was mainly driven by the squeezing force F-p, while when f(-1)Ca(c) > 0.01, both the squeezing force F-p and shear force F-t contributed to droplet formation. Additionally, the prediction correlations of the dimensionless sizes of the slug droplets in both regions were established based on the flow rate ratio of the two-phase, the dimensionless orifice size, and the Capillary number of the continuous phase. The predicted results are in good agreement with the experimental values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据