4.6 Article

Diagenetic Evolution Control on Reservoir Quality of the Oligocene Weizhou Formation in Weixinan Sag of Beibuwan Basin, Northern South China Sea

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11072171

关键词

diagenesis; grain-coating chlorite; kaolinite; quartz overgrowth; beibuwan basin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the diagenetic evolution of the reservoir in the E(3)w(3) member of the Oligocene Weizhou Formation in Beibuwan Basin, northern South China Sea. The occurrence states and effects of different clay minerals, including chlorite, illite, kaolinite, and quartz cement, are analyzed. The study identifies three different occurrences of chlorite and three major types of diagenetic kaolinite. The presence of chlorite coating has a significant effect on quartz overgrowth.
This study focuses on the diagenetic evolution of the reservoir in the third member of the Oligocene Weizhou Formation (E(3)w(3)) in Weinan Sag of Beibuwan Basin, northern South China Sea. Based on the contents and occurrence states of chlorite, illite, kaolinite and quartz cement were described by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thin section and X-ray diffraction. In the E(3)w(3) reservoir, three different occurrences of chlorite are recognized. These include chlorite coating, leaf-shaped chlorite and tongue-shaped chlorite. Furthermore, three major types of diagenetic kaolinite are observed. These include kaolin crystallization promoted by fluids of meteoric origin, kaolin formed by organic acids and blocky kaolin. In addition, feldspar, by organic acid dissolution, can mainly form kaolinite but also form illite or chlorite in the E(3)w(3) reservoir. Different clay minerals have different effects on reservoir quality, which are controlled by occurrence and diagenetic environment. Compared to the other minerals, chlorite coating has a greater effect on quartz overgrowth. However, If minerals are packed in intergranular pores, they have a negative effect on reservoir quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据