4.8 Article

Pore-forming activity and structural autoinhibition of the gasdermin family

期刊

NATURE
卷 535, 期 7610, 页码 111-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18590

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB08020202]
  2. China National Science Foundation Program for Distinguished Young Scholars [31225002]
  3. Program for International Collaborations [31461143006]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program [2012CB518700, 2014CB849602]
  5. International Early Career Scientist grant from Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  6. Beijing Scholar Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory caspases cleave the gasdermin D (GSDMD) protein to trigger pyroptosis, a lytic form of cell death that is crucial for immune defences and diseases. GSDMD contains a functionally important gasdermin-N domain that is shared in the gasdermin family. The functional mechanism of action of gasdermin proteins is unknown. Here we show that the gasdermin-N domains of the gasdermin proteins GSDMD, GSDMA3 and GSDMA can bind membrane lipids, phosphoinositides and cardiolipin, and exhibit membrane-disrupting cytotoxicity in mammalian cells and artificially transformed bacteria. Gasdermin-N moved to the plasma membrane during pyroptosis. Purified gasdermin-N efficiently lysed phosphoinositide/cardiolipin-containing liposomes and formed pores on membranes made of artificial or natural phospholipid mixtures. Most gasdermin pores had an inner diameter of 10-14 nm and contained 16 symmetric protomers. The crystal structure of GSDMA3 showed an autoinhibited two-domain architecture that is conserved in the gasdermin family. Structure-guided mutagenesis demonstrated that the liposome-leakage and pore-forming activities of the gasdermin-N domain are required for pyroptosis. These findings reveal the mechanism for pyroptosis and provide insights into the roles of the gasdermin family in necrosis, immunity and diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据