4.4 Article

Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter spp Infection in Critically Ill Patients With Limited Treatment Options: A Descriptive Study of Cefiderocol Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

期刊

OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad329

关键词

COVID-19; Acinetobacter; cefiderocol; mortality; septic shock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with complex cases of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection were treated with cefiderocol, resulting in an overall clinical success rate of 53.1%. The success rate was higher in patients without septic shock and without COVID-19. This study highlights the challenges in treating drug-resistant infections and the potential effectiveness of cefiderocol in these cases.
Patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection often present a complex scenario. In 147 severely ill patients with septic shock and/or COVID-19 and multiple treatment failures, clinical success following cefiderocol treatment was 53.1% overall, and 62.5% in those without septic shock. Background Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. Methods A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionogi's early access program for Acinetobacter spp infections (1 April 2020-30 April 2021; 27 sites; Italy, Spain, Germany, France). Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as clinical resolution of infection at day 14 or day 28 survival. Results Overall, 147 patients were included. Primary infection sites were respiratory (65.3%) and bloodstream (unknown source [15.6%]; catheter-related [10.9%]); 24.5% of patients had polymicrobial infection. Of 136 patients in intensive care (92.5%), 85.3% (116/136) received mechanical ventilation. Septic shock (55.6% [70/126]) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (81.6%) were prevalent. Prior to cefiderocol, 85.0% of patients received gram-negative treatment, 61.2% received & GE;2 antimicrobials, and most received colistin (58.5%; median duration, 11.5 days). Cefiderocol monotherapy was used in 30.6% of patients. Clinical success rate was 53.1% and was higher in patients without septic shock (62.5%), without COVID-19 (77.8%), and with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (quartile 1 [median, 3; range, 0-5]: 82.9%). Day 28 survival was 44.9% and was higher in patients without septic shock (60.7%), without COVID-19 (59.3%), with lower SOFA score (quartile 1: 82.9%), and receiving first-line cefiderocol (68.2% [15/22]). Resolution of infection at day 14 occurred in 39.5% of patients. Conclusions Despite use in complex patients with limited treatment options and high septic shock/COVID-19 rates, cefiderocol treatment was associated with an overall clinical success rate of 53%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据