4.7 Article

Collagen films functionalized with gallic acid in the presence of laccase for beef preservation

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101100

关键词

Collagen; Gallic acid; Laccase; Beef preservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Collagen films were functionalized with gallic acid (GA) at different concentrations using laccase. FTIR analysis showed the formation of crosslinking bonds between collagen and GA. Increasing GA concentration resulted in stronger crosslinking and improved stability of GA in the film. At a GA concentration of 8 mmol, the collagen film had increased tensile strength and denaturation temperature. Films with GA concentration ≥ 4 mmol exhibited scavenging activity against DPPH radicals and antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli. The film with 8 mmol GA showed potential for food packaging by reducing spoilage during beef storage.
Collagen films were functionalized with different concentrations of gallic acid (GA) in the presence of laccase. FTIR results suggested that crosslinking bonds formed between the amino groups of collagen and quinone radicals generated from the oxidized phenolic hydroxyl groups of GA by laccase. The amount of cross-linking gradually increased with increasing GA concentration. The formed covalent cross-linking bonds strengthened the combination between collagen and GA, improving the stability of GA in the film matrix. The tensile strength and denaturation temperature of collagen film was increased by 43.01 MPa and 17.9 degrees C, respectively, at GA concentration of 8 mmol. When GA concentration was & GE; 4 mmol, the films exhibited obvious scavenging activity against DPPH free radicals and antibacterial activities against S. aureus and E. coli. Film with 8 mmol GA could reduce the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance values, total viable count and total volatile basic nitrogen content of beef during storage, showing a good application potential in food packaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据