4.7 Article

Rheological and Viscoelastic Analysis of Hybrid Formulations for Topical Application

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102392

关键词

skin; topical products; liposomes; cream; gel; thermal water; rheology; viscoelasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the rheological and viscoelastic properties of hybrid formulations loaded with ultradeformable liposomes (UDL). The formulations exhibited non-Newtonian behavior with pseudoplastic traits, and the incorporation of UDL induced rheological changes. Frequency sweep tests showed predominantly elastic solid behavior at different temperatures and post-production times.
The rheological and viscoelastic properties of hybrid formulations composed of vehicles designed for cutaneous topical application and loaded with ultradeformable liposomes (UDL) were assessed. UDL were selected for their established ability to transport both lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds through the skin, and are applicable in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Formulations underwent flow analysis and were fitted to the Herschel-Bulkley model due to their prevalent non-Newtonian behavior in most cases. Linear viscoelastic regions (LVR) were identified, and G ' and G '' moduli were determined via frequency sweep steps, considering the impact of temperature and aging. The formulations exhibited non-Newtonian behavior with pseudoplastic traits in most cases, with UDL incorporation inducing rheological changes. LVR and frequency sweep tests indicated predominantly elastic solid behavior, with G ' higher than G '', at different temperatures and post-production times. Tan delta values also illustrated a predominant solid-like behavior over liquid. This study provides pivotal insights into the rheological and viscoelastic features of topical formulations, emphasizing the crucial role of meticulous vehicle and formulation selection when incorporating UDL or analogous liposomal drug delivery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据