4.7 Article

Factors That Influence Sustained Release from Hot-Melt Extrudates

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071996

关键词

hot-melt extrusion; sustained release; dissolution; particle size; Eudragit polymer; flurbiprofen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hot-melt extrusion is widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to increase the solubility of poorly soluble drugs. This study investigated the release of flurbiprofen from sustained-release hot-melt extrudates with different Eudragit polymers. The choice of polymer and particle size reduction by milling were found to be key factors influencing the release profile, while drug loading and hydrodynamics had minimal impact. Hot-melt extrusion allows for tailored drug release through particle size and polymer selection, with robustness under various hydrodynamic conditions.
Hot-melt extrusion is a well-established tool in the pharmaceutical industry, mostly implemented to increase the solubility of poorly soluble drugs. A less frequent application of this technique is to obtain formulations with extended release. This study investigated the influence of polymer choice, drug loading, milling and hydrodynamics on the release of a model drug, flurbiprofen, from sustained-release hot-melt extrudates with Eudragit polymers. The choice of polymer and degree of particle size reduction of the extrudate by milling were the two key influences on the release profile: the percentage release after 12 h varied from 6% (2 mm threads) to 84% (particle size <125 & mu;m) for Eudragit RL extrudates vs. 4.5 to 62% for the corresponding Eudragit RS extrudates. By contrast, the release profile was largely independent of drug loading and robust to hydrodynamics in the dissolution vessel. Thus, hot-melt extrusion offers the ability to tailor the release of the API to the therapeutic indication through a combination of particle size and polymer choice while providing robustness over a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据