4.6 Article

Inhomogeneously distributed ferroptosis with a high peak-to-valley ratio may improve the antitumor immune response

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178681

关键词

immunotherapy; ferroptosis; dose heterogeneity; modulated hyperthermia; nanoparticle; radiotherapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined radiotherapy and mild hyperthermia have been used clinically to improve local control, but long-lasting abscopal effects have not been commonly observed. A proposed hypothesis emphasizes the importance of the dose distribution peak-to-valley ratio within the tumor to induce immunogenic ferrroptosis while avoiding nonimmunogenic ferroptosis. To increase the peak-to-valley ratio, possible implications include using nanoparticles with conventional therapy, high modulation depth hyperthermia, or spatially fractionated radiotherapy.
Combined radiotherapy (RT) and mild hyperthermia have been used clinically for decades to increase local control. Both modalities tend to achieve a homogeneous dose distribution within treatment targets to induce immunogenic cell death. However, marked, and long-lasting abscopal effects have not usually been observed. We proposed a hypothesis to emphasize the importance of the peak-to-valley ratio of the dose distribution inside the tumor to induce immunogenic ferrroptosis in peak area while avoid nonimmunogenic ferroptosis in valley area. Although inhomogeneous distributed energy absorption has been noted in many anticancer medical fields, the idea of sedulously created dose inhomogeneity related to antitumor immunity has not been discussed. To scale up the peak-to-valley ratio, we proposed possible implications by the combination of nanoparticles (NP) with conventional RT or hyperthermia, or the use of a high modulation depth of extremely low frequency hyperthermia or high resolution spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) to enhance the antitumor immune reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据