4.8 Article

Thirst neurons anticipate the homeostatic consequences of eating and drinking

期刊

NATURE
卷 537, 期 7622, 页码 680-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18950

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [1144247]
  2. UCSF Discovery Fellowship
  3. New York Stem Cell Foundation
  4. American Diabetes Association
  5. Rita Allen Foundation
  6. McKnight Foundation
  7. Sloan Foundation
  8. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  9. Klingenstein Foundation
  10. Program for Breakthrough Biological Research Foundation
  11. NIH [DP2-DK109533, R01-DK106399, R01-NS094781]
  12. UCSF Diabetes and Obesity Centers [U01 DK089541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thirst motivates animals to drink in order to maintain fluid balance. Thirst has conventionally been viewed as a homeostatic response to changes in blood volume or tonicity(1-3). However, most drinking behaviour is regulated too rapidly to be controlled by blood composition directly, and instead seems to anticipate homeostatic imbalances before they arise(4-11). How this is achieved remains unknown. Here we reveal an unexpected role for the subfornical organ (SFO) in the anticipatory regulation of thirst in mice. By monitoring deep-brain calcium dynamics, we show that thirst-promoting SFO neurons respond to inputs from the oral cavity during eating and drinking and then integrate these inputs with information about the composition of the blood. This integration allows SFO neurons to predict how ongoing food and water consumption will alter fluid balance in the future and then to adjust behaviour pre-emptively. Complementary optogenetic manipulations show that this anticipatory modulation is necessary for drinking in several contexts. These findings provide a neural mechanism to explain longstanding behavioural observations, including the prevalence of drinking during meals(10,11), the rapid satiation of thirst(7-9), and the fact that oral cooling is thirst-quenching(12-14).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据