4.8 Article

Structural basis of potent Zika-dengue virus antibody cross-neutralization

期刊

NATURE
卷 536, 期 7614, 页码 48-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18938

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [282 378FP7]
  2. Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases Labex (Laboratoire d'Excellence (French Government's Investissements d'Avenir program) [ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID]
  3. transnational ANR/FWF grant [FlaviStem/I1378]
  4. Medical Research Council, UK
  5. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Funding Scheme, UK
  6. NEUTRAVIR grant from Region ile-de-France (DIM-Maladies Infectieuses)
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 1378] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G0801508, MR/N012658/1, G0600000, G0400720] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I1378, P27501] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  10. MRC [G0801508, G0400720] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zika virus is a member of the Flavivirus genus that had not been associated with severe disease in humans until the recent outbreaks, when it was linked to microcephaly in newborns in Brazil and to Guillain-Barre syndrome in adults in French Polynesia. Zika virus is related to dengue virus, and here we report that a subset of antibodies targeting a conformational epitope isolated from patients with dengue virus also potently neutralize Zika virus. The crystal structure of two of these antibodies in complex with the envelope protein of Zika virus reveals the details of a conserved epitope, which is also the site of interaction of the envelope protein dimer with the precursor membrane (prM) protein during virus maturation. Comparison of the Zika and dengue virus immunocomplexes provides a lead for rational, epitope-focused design of a universal vaccine capable of eliciting potent cross-neutralizing antibodies to protect simultaneously against both Zika and dengue virus infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据