4.6 Article

Opposing Roles of Blood-Borne Monocytes and Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Limbal Stem Cell Damage after Ocular Injury

期刊

CELLS
卷 12, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12162089

关键词

limbal stem cell deficiency; cornea; epithelium; macrophages; monocytes; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency is a common and severe complication after chemical injury to the eye. This study reveals that LSC damage is mediated by immune cell mediators, even without direct injury to LSCs. Elevated pH in the anterior chamber triggers uveal stress, release of inflammatory cytokines, and subsequent LSC damage and death.
Limbal stem cell (LSC) deficiency is a frequent and severe complication after chemical injury to the eye. Previous studies have assumed this is mediated directly by the caustic agent. Here we show that LSC damage occurs through immune cell mediators, even without direct injury to LSCs. In particular, pH elevation in the anterior chamber (AC) causes acute uveal stress, the release of inflammatory cytokines at the basal limbal tissue, and subsequent LSC damage and death. Peripheral C-C chemokine receptor type 2 positive/CX3C motif chemokine receptor 1 negative (CCR2+ CX3CR1-) monocytes are the key mediators of LSC damage through the upregulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) at the limbus. In contrast to peripherally derived monocytes, CX3CR1+ CCR2- tissue-resident macrophages have a protective role, and their depletion prior to injury exacerbates LSC loss and increases LSC vulnerability to TNF-a-mediated apoptosis independently of CCR2+ cell infiltration into the tissue. Consistently, repopulation of the tissue by new resident macrophages not only restores the protective M2-like phenotype of macrophages but also suppresses LSC loss after exposure to inflammatory signals. These findings may have clinical implications in patients with LSC loss after chemical burns or due to other inflammatory conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据