4.7 Article

Rifaximin Use, Adherence and Persistence in Patients with Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Real-World Study in the South of Italy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134515

关键词

hepatic encephalopathy; rifaximin; adherence; persistence; drug utilization; real-world data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) patients in Italy. It found that only 58.5% of patients received rifaximin, and after one year, only 54.5% were adherent and persistent users of the medication.
Real-world data on the therapeutic management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) patients are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HE medications prescribed in an Italian cohort of HE patients post-discharge and to assess the real-world rifaximin adherence and persistence over 1 year. An observation retrospective study was conducted using data retrieved from outpatient pharmaceutical databases and hospital discharge records of the Campania region. For all subjects hospitalized for HE during 2019 (cohort 1), the HE medications prescribed within 60 days after discharge were evaluated. Adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence were estimated for rifaximin 550 mg incident users over 1 year (cohort 2). Patients with PDC & GE;80% were considered adherents. Persistence was defined as the period of time from the first rifaximin prescription to the date of discontinuation. Discontinuation was assessed using the permissible gap method. In cohort 1, 544 patients were identified; 58.5% received rifaximin while 15.6% only received non-absorbable disaccharides and 25.9% did not receive any HE medications. In cohort 2, 650 users were selected; only 54.5% were adherents and 35% were persistent users at 1 year. This real-world study highlights that quality improvement in therapeutic management is needed to potentially improve the outcomes of HE patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据