4.7 Article

Influence of Age on Speech Recognition in Noise and Hearing Effort in Listeners with Age-Related Hearing Loss

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196133

关键词

hearing in noise; age-related hearing loss; reference values; hearing effort; speech recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to measure the effect of age on speech recognition and listening effort, as well as the influence of spatial configuration of sound sources and noise signals. The results showed that speech recognition in noise decreased with age, especially for icra5 noise. Additionally, SRT50 and SNRcut were better for icra5 noise compared to olnoise across all age groups.
The aim of this study was to measure how age affects the speech recognition threshold (SRT50) of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA) and the listening effort at the corresponding signal-to-noise ratio (SNRcut). The study also investigated the effect of the spatial configuration of sound sources and noise signals on SRT50 and SNRcut. To achieve this goal, the study used olnoise and icra5 noise presented from one or more spatial locations from the front and back. Ninety-nine participants with age-related hearing loss in the 18-80 years age range, specifically in the 18-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, 61-70, and 71-80 age groups, participated in this study. Speech recognition and listening effort in noise were measured and compared between the different age groups, different spatial sound configurations and noise signals. Speech recognition in noise decreased with age and became significant from the age group of 50-51. The decrease in SRT50 with age was greater for icra5 noise than for olnoise. For all age groups, SRT50 and SNRcut were better for icra5 noise than for olnoise. The measured age-related reference data for SRT50 and SNRcut can be used in further studies in listeners with age-related hearing loss and hearing aid or implant users.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据