4.7 Article

Role of Serum Interleukin-6, Interleukin-1β and Interleukin-10 in Assessment of Disease Activity and Nutritional Status in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185956

关键词

inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; Il-10; Il-6; IL-1 beta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the usefulness of serum IL-6, IL-1 beta, and IL-10 in determining the activity and nutritional status in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The results showed that IL-6 and IL-1 beta may provide additional information about the nutritional status of IBD patients, while IL-10 can be considered as a non-invasive biomarker of IBD activity.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are characterised by multifactorial and chronic inflammation. Much attention has been paid to immune dysfunction in inflammatory bowel diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of serum IL-6, IL-1 beta and IL-10 in determining the activity and nutritional status in IBD patients. The case-control study was carried out on 82 patients with IBD; the control group consisted of 25 clinically healthy subjects. The serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-1 beta and IL-10 were determined by the quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. There were no significant differences in IL-6 and IL-1 beta levels in UC and CD patients according to disease activity as assessed by the Montreal classification, Partial Mayo Score and CDAI. Significantly higher IL-6 levels were found in patients with low body fat in comparison to patients with normal body fat. Furthermore, significantly higher mean IL-6 levels were observed in patients with excess body fat in comparison to patients with normal body fat, and also in comparison to patients with deficient body fat. IL-6 and IL-1 beta may provide extra information regarding the nutritional status of IBD patients. IL-10 can be considered a non-invasive biomarker of IBD activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据