4.7 Review

Between-Sex Differences in Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease among Patients with Myocardial Infarction-A Systematic Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155163

关键词

risk factors; myocardial infarction; sex; gender; women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed 18 studies and found gender differences in the presentation, risk factors, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Women were more likely to have coexisting conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure, while men were more likely to have previous ischemic heart disease, angina, dyslipidemia, and a smoking history. Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these differences and the role of gender-specific risk factors.
Between-sex differences in the presentation, risk factors, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (MI) are well documented. However, as such differences are highly sensitive to cultural and social changes, there is a need to continuously re-evaluate the evidence. The present contemporary systematic review assesses the baseline characteristics of men and women presenting to secondary, tertiary, and quaternary centres with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Over 1.4 million participants from 18 studies, including primary prospective, cross sectional and retrospective observational studies, as well as secondary analysis of registry data are included in the study. The study showed that women were more likely than men to have a previous diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure. They also had lower odds of presenting with previous ischaemic heart disease and angina, dyslipidaemia, or a smoking history. Further work is necessary to understand the reasons for these differences, and the role that gender-specific risk factors may have in this context. Moreover, how these between-gender differences are implicated in management and outcomes also requires further work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据