4.7 Article

Dietary Behaviors and Beliefs in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103455

关键词

dietary behaviors; dietary beliefs; IBD; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; diet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated dietary perceptions and behaviors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Most patients believed that diet can trigger IBD relapses and imposed food restrictions to prevent relapses. However, these behaviors may not align with current scientific knowledge.
Introduction: Due to a lack of clear dietary guidelines, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) self-impose dietary restrictions based on their own nutritional experiences. The aim of this study was to investigate dietary perceptions and behavior in IBD patients. Materials and methods: A total of 82 patients (48 with Crohn's disease and 34 with ulcerative colitis) participated in this prospective, questionnaire-based study. Based on a literature review, the questionnaire was developed to investigate dietary beliefs, behaviors and food exclusions during IBD relapses and remission. Results: The majority of patients (85.4%) believed that diet can be a trigger factor for IBD relapses, and 32.9% believed that diet initiates the disease. The majority of patients (81.7%) believed that they should eliminate some products from their diets. The most often-pointed-out products were spicy and fatty foods, raw fruits and vegetables, alcohol, leguminous foods, cruciferous vegetables, dairy products and milk. Most patients (75%) modified their diets after diagnosis, and 81.7% imposed food restrictions to prevent IBD relapses. Conclusions: The majority of patients avoided certain foods during relapses as well as to maintain remission of IBD, basing this on their own beliefs, inconsistently with current scientific knowledge. Patient education should be a key determinant in IBD control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据