4.7 Article

Increased Prevalence of Autoimmune Gastritis in Patients with a Gastric Precancerous Lesion

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196152

关键词

autoimmune gastritis; gastric precancerous lesions; gastrin 17; pepsinogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the prevalence and characteristics of autoimmune gastritis (AIG) in gastric precancerous lesion (GPL) patients. The results showed that the prevalence of AIG is higher in GPL patients but often goes undiagnosed. Using G17 and PG I/II as diagnostic markers can help identify patients with AIG and improve surveillance programs for GPL patients.
Background: Autoimmune gastritis (AIG), characterized with the presence of anti-parietal-cell antibodies (APCA), is a risk factor for gastric cancer. However, AIG may go underdiagnosed, especially in the case of H. pylori infection and the presence of gastric precancerous lesions (GPL), due to the ambiguous pathology and delayed symptom onset. Aim: Investigate the prevalence and characteristics of AIG in GPL patients. Methods: Prevalence of AIG was determined with the presence of APCA in patients with GPL (n = 256) and the control group (n = 70). Pathological characteristics and levels of gastrin 17 (G17), pepsinogen (PG) I and II and anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG were assessed in GPL cases, and the severity of intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy was scored by expert pathologists. Results: APCA positivity was observed in 18% of cases vs. 7% of controls (p = 0.033). Only 3/256 patients were previously diagnosed with AIG. The presence of APCA was associated with corpus-limited and extended GPL. A receiver operating curve analysis demonstrated that the G17 and PGI/II ratio could identify APCA-positive patients within GPL cases (AUC: 0.884). Conclusions: The prevalence of AIG is higher in patients with GPL but goes undiagnosed. Using G17 and PG I/II as diagnostic markers can help to identify patients with AIG and improve surveillance programs for patients with GPL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据