4.7 Article

Long-acting lenacapavir protects macaques against intravenous challenge with simian-tropic HIV

期刊

EBIOMEDICINE
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104764

关键词

HIV; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; PrEP; Nonhuman primate; Macaque; Capsid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that LEN has potent antiviral activity against stHIV-A19 and can prevent HIV-1 infection in a nonhuman primate model. The sustained plasma drug exposures of subcutaneous LEN support its potential as a long-acting PrEP for humans.
Background Long-acting subcutaneous lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class HIV capsid inhibitor approved by the US FDA for the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 with twice yearly dosing, is under investigation for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We previously derived a simian-tropic HIV-1 clone (stHIV-A19) that encodes an HIV-1 capsid and replicates to high titres in pigtail macaques (PTM), resulting in a nonhuman primate model well-suited for evaluating LEN PrEP in vivo.Methods Lenacapavir potency against stHIV-A19 in PTM peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro was determined and subcutaneous LEN pharmacokinetics were evaluated in naive PTMs in vivo. To evaluate the protective efficacy of LEN PrEP, naive PTMs received either a single subcutaneous injection of LEN (25 mg/kg, N = 3) or vehicle (N = 4) 30 days before a high-dose intravenous challenge with stHIV-A19, or 7 daily subcutaneous injections of a 3-drug control PrEP regimen starting 3 days before stHIV-A19 challenge (N = 3).Findings In vitro, LEN showed potent antiviral activity against stHIV-A19, comparable to its potency against HIV-1. In vivo, subcutaneous LEN displayed sustained plasma drug exposures in PTMs. Following stHIV-A19 challenge, while all vehicle control animals became productively infected, all LEN and 3-drug control PrEP animals were protected from infection.Interpretation These findings highlight the utility of the stHIV-A19/PTM model and support the clinical development of long-acting LEN for PrEP in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据