4.8 Article

Pathway-specific inputs to the superior colliculus support flexible responses to visual threat

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 35, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade3874

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioral flexibility relies on the directed routing of sensory information. In the superior colliculus, inhibitory projection neurons projecting to different targets modulate responses to visual threats. By tracing neural connections and conducting recordings, it was found that these inhibitory neurons form separate populations projecting to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and the parabigeminal nucleus (PBG), receiving different inputs. Inhibiting LGN-projecting Gad2 neurons increased freezing behavior, while inhibiting PBG-projecting Gad2 neurons increased escaping behavior, indicating context-specific effects on behavior.
Behavioral flexibility requires directing feedforward sensory information to appropriate targets. In the superior colliculus, divergent outputs orchestrate different responses to visual threats, but the circuit organization enabling the flexible routing of sensory information remains unknown. To determine this structure, we focused on inhibitory projection (Gad2) neurons. Trans-synaptic tracing and neuronal recordings revealed that Gad2 neurons projecting to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and the parabigeminal nucleus (PBG) form two separate populations, each receiving a different set of non-retinal inputs. Inhibiting the LGN- or PBG-projecting Gad2 neurons resulted in opposing effects on behavior; increasing freezing or escape probability to visual looming, respectively. Optogenetic activation of selected inputs to the LGN- and PBG-projecting Gad2 cells predictably regulated responses to visual threat. These data suggest that projection-specific sampling of brain-wide inputs provides a circuit design principle that enables visual inputs to be selectively routed to produce context-specific behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据