4.4 Article

Phage single-stranded DNA-binding protein or host DNA damage triggers the activation of the AbpAB phage defense system

期刊

MSPHERE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00372-23

关键词

bacteriophages; Escherichia coli; phage defense system; AbpA-AbpB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria have developed defense mechanisms, such as abortive infection (Abi), to protect against phages. The AbpAB defense system in Escherichia coli inhibits the propagation of lytic phages and the induction of lysogenic phages by sensing the presence of phages and DNA-protein complexes. AbpA and AbpB in the AbpAB system play crucial roles in phage defense through their nuclease and RNA helicase domains.
Bacteria have developed various defense mechanisms against phages. Abortive infection (Abi), a bacterial defense mechanism, can be achieved through various means, including toxin-antitoxin systems, cyclic oligonucleotide-based antiphage signaling systems, and retrons. AbpA and AbpB (AbpAB) defend against many lytic phages harboring double-stranded DNA genomes in Escherichia coli; however, how AbpAB senses phage infection and inhibits its propagation remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that AbpAB inhibited the growth of the phi X174 lytic phage with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as well as the lysogenization and induction of the Sakai prophage 5 lysogenic phage. The AbpAB defense system limits T4 and phi X174 phage propagation via Abi. AbpA contains a nuclease domain at its N-terminus, and AbpB has an ATP-dependent RNA helicase domain; both domains are required for phage defense. This system is activated by phage Gp32 binding to ssDNA and inhibits E. coli growth. Without phage infection, DNA replication inhibitors or defects in the DNA repair factors RecB and RecC activate this system. Therefore, the E. coli AbpAB defense system may sense DNA-protein complexes, including the phage-encoded ssDNA-binding protein or those formed by interrupting host DNA replication or repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据