4.6 Article

Portable Colorimetric Hydrogel Beads for Point-of-Care Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

期刊

ACS SENSORS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.3c01155

关键词

point-of-care testing (POCT); antimicrobial susceptibilitytesting (AST); sepsis; antibiotic resistance; chromatic biosensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a chromatic biosensor composed of poly(diacetylene), alginate, and LB broth (PAL) that can complete antimicrobial susceptibility testing in a short amount of time. The biosensor is portable, stable, and yields comparable results to the gold standard methods.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition with systemic inflammatory responses caused by bacterial infections. Considering the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), sepsis is a great threat to public health. The gold standard methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), however, take at least approximately 3 days to implement the entire blood culture, pure culture, and AST processes. To overcome the time-consuming nature of conventional AST, a method employing a chromatic biosensor composed of poly(diacetylene), alginate, and LB broth (PAL) is introduced in this study. Compared to the gold standards, AST with PAL biosensors can be completed within a time frame as short as 16 h. Such a significant reduction in time is possible because the consecutive cultures and AST are carried out simultaneously by encapsulating the bacterial nutrients and detection molecules into a single component. The bead-like hydrogel sensors were used in their freeze-dried form, which endows them with portability and stability, thus making them adequate for point-of-care testing. The PAL biosensor yields minimum inhibitory concentrations comparable to those from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, and the applicability of the biosensor is further shown in MRSA-infected mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据