4.2 Article

Silk sericin-hydroxyapatite nanoribbons toward structurally stable osteogenic scaffolds

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s41779-023-00909-4

关键词

Sericin; Hydroxyapatite; Osteoinduction; Bone; Implant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building a successful bone-implant interface is a challenging task. Silkworm sericin and hydroxyapatite have shown promising results in promoting osteogenic differentiation and mineralization density. Combining these two materials in a scaffold can enhance cell proliferation and improve the success of bone biomaterial interfaces.
Building a successful, cost-effective, and natural solution toward improving the bone-implant interface is an outstanding challenge. Silkworm sericin attracted the attention of bone researchers in the past decade due to its unexpected performance toward inherently promoting osteogenic differentiation of progenitor/stem cells. Hydroxyapatite is widely utilized in bone tissue regenerative scaffolds as the majority of bone matrix is constituted of inorganic material, primarily hydroxyapatite. Combining sericin and hydroxyapatite pledges improved mineralization performance in a bone regenerative scaffold which could increase the success of implanted bone biomaterial interfaces. Through electrospinning, we produced sericin and hydroxyapatite nanoribbons to present a high surface area and porous scaffold to culture osteoprogenitors and aimed to enhance cell adhesion and proliferation ultimately improving mineralization density. Material characterization is performed through field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. We showed that the addition of hydroxyapatite into sericin nanoribbons significantly enhanced cell proliferation and cytoskeletal organization in vitro and detected an overall improvement in mineral density. We propose that sericin nanoribbons reinforced with hydroxyapatite are suitable platforms for further bone regenerative interface applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据