4.7 Article

Capacitating urban governance and planning systems to drive transformative resilience

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104637

关键词

Urban; Governance; Planning; Transformative resilience; Transition; Capacity; Change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urban governance and planning systems play a crucial role in advancing sustainable development, climate change adaptation, and disaster risk reduction. However, these systems need to be revised in order to drive a transition towards new governance arrangements and planning mechanisms.
Urban governance and planning systems are central cornerstones of international research and policy initiatives to advance sustainable development, climate change adaptation, and disaster risk reduction in the context of increasing global environmental change. Yet, the inherent processes and components of conventional governance and planning systems, such as discourses, structures, tools, and practices, must be revised to drive a transition to fundamentally new governance arrangements and planning mechanisms. We present a framework featuring four characteristics for capacitating urban governance and planning systems to accelerate the shift toward trans -formative resilience: foresight and path-shifting, collaboration and leadership, creativity and agility, and experimentation and embeddedness. The framework addresses the components and processes of present governance and planning systems that must be transformed and highlights the mechanisms required to drive the transformation. These include discourse reorientation, structure reorganization, tool innovation, and practice expansion. The framework also underlines eight significant functional, social, political, institutional, ecological, technological, legal, and financial dimensions that will be used to operationalize the framework in the next step in order to evaluate the associated opportunities and constraints of current planning systems toward trans -formative change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据