4.6 Article

Assessing the research performance of Petrobras' programs on research, development, and innovation (RD&I)

期刊

ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101213

关键词

Research; Development; Oil & gas; Energy; Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper assesses the relationship between recent research on the RD&I sector of Petrobras and the quantitative data available in the company's reports and Brazilian regulatory agencies. The findings suggest that the company's state development, human resources, innovation clusters, increase in patents and production, and cost reduction are directly related to the variation in innovation networks, state policies, and internal human resource policies. Furthermore, it is discovered that short-term outcomes are not correlated with training or R&D spending, but a long-term drop in investment could lead to risks such as a decline in researchers, technical advancement, oil reserves, and output growth.
This paper assesses the existence of a relationship between recent research on the Research, Development, and Innovation (RD&I or R&D) sector of Petrobras with the quantitative data available in the company's reports and the Brazilian regulatory agencies. For this, 44 articles were selected using two main criteria: addressing the RD&I subject and being published in indexed peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2022. There are three perspectives from which the company RD&I (state development, human resources, and innovation clusters), increase in patents and production, and cost reduction are directly related to the qualitative and quantitative variation of innovation networks, state policies, and the improvement of internal human resource policies. Additionally, it was discovered that short-term outcomes could not be correlated with the level of training or R&D spending. However, a long-term drop in investment could lead to hazards such a decline in researchers, technical advancement, oil reserves, and the rate of output growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据