4.5 Article

Spatial optimization of integrated energy system including hydrogen electrolysis center based on mixed integer second-order cone programming

期刊

ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.1533

关键词

electric vehicles; energy dispatch; Fuel cell vehicles; integrated energy systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper optimizes the spatial scheduling of electrolytic hydrogen centers (HECs) and electric vehicles (EVs) in integrated energy systems (IES) to minimize network loss while ensuring safe operation of the power grid. The proposed method is validated using a simulation instance, showing its effectiveness in reducing network loss and providing reference for HEC optimization.
Hydrogen energy is playing an increasingly important role in integrated energy systems (IES) due to its multiple uses. Green hydrogen can be produced from electricity generated from renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions and environmental pollution. Previous work usually only considers electric vehicles (EVs) as flexible loads, and there are few studies on the production and application process of green hydrogen. In this paper, hydrogen electrolysis centers (HECs) and EVs are simultaneously schedulable loads, integrated into IES, and optimized. The distribution network model is established, and the optimization goal is to minimize network loss while ensuring the safe operation of the power grid. Through the power flow optimization method of mixed-integer second-order cone programming, the space optimization scheduling of EVs in the IES is carried out, and the optimal location of the HEC is reasonably planned and set. A simulation instance of IEEE 33 nodes is used to verify the proposed method. The final results show that this method can minimize network loss in the range of safe operation of the system for the spatial scheduling of electrolytic hydrogen centers and EVs. At the same time, it can also provide a reference for HEC addressing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据