4.6 Article

Non-Invasive Characterization of Maiolica Layer Structure by Terahertz Time-Domain Imaging

期刊

COATINGS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13071268

关键词

THz imaging; non-invasive testing; cultural heritage; maiolica; stratigraphic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the potential of Terahertz Time-Domain Imaging (THz-TDI) as a non-invasive tool for characterizing the layered structure of maiolica wares. The study used THz-TDI to analyze samples with different stratigraphy and successfully identified glaze layers. However, layers applied over the white glaze were not detected due to their thickness being below the range resolution of the THz-TDI system. The study also identified hidden morphological features beneath the surface, providing insights into the manufacturing technique.
The characterization of the layered structure is of paramount importance for the study of maiolica wares (tin-glazed pottery). This paper presents the potentialities of Terahertz Time-Domain Imaging (THz-TDI) as a tool to perform non-invasive stratigraphic analysis of the maiolica objects under test. Samples with different types of stratigraphy, as testified by preliminary SEM-EDS analysis, were investigated by THz-TDI in laboratory conditions. The collected THz data were processed by means of noise filtering procedures and a time-of-flight-based imaging approach and the achieved results corroborate the ability to identify glaze layers, whose electromagnetic properties, i.e., the refraction index and the dielectric permittivity value, were estimated by taking into account both THz-TDI and SEM-EDS data. However, layers applied over the white glaze (namely, a transparent overglaze and a luster decoration) were not detected, probably since their thickness is below the range resolution of the adopted THz-TDI system. Morphological features hidden under the surface were also identified and they provided information about the manufacturing technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据