4.6 Article

Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite on Ti6Al4V and Si(100) Surfaces by Pulsed Laser Deposition

期刊

COATINGS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13101681

关键词

hydroxyapatite coating; pulsed laser deposition; mechanical testing; bioactivity; protein adsorption; surface characterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of substrate temperature and ablation wavelength/mechanism on the properties of hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings. The results indicated that increasing temperature led to increased crystallinity of the coatings. However, temperatures above 700℃ negatively affected protein adsorption and adhesion properties of the coatings.
In this study, the effects of substrate temperature and ablation wavelength/mechanism on the structural, mechanical, and bioactivity properties of hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings were investigated. HA coatings were deposited on both Si(100) and Ti6Al4V surfaces. Substrate temperature varied from room temperature to 800 degrees C. Depositions were performed in Ar/H2O and vacuum environments. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy techniques were used to analyze structural and morphological variations. The adherence of coatings to the substrates was assessed by the pull-out method. The obtained data indicated that with the temperature increase, the coatings steadily crystallized. However, temperatures above 700 degrees C adversely affected protein adsorption and adhesion properties. Similar trends were confirmed via pull-out testing, protein adsorption, and cell proliferation tests. The ablation mechanism was also proven to play an important role in the deposition process. Overall, this study provides further evidence that crystallinity is a vital factor in the functionality of the coatings and depends on the deposition conditions. However, all measurements directly indicated that beyond 700 degrees C, the morpho-structural, mechanical, and bioactivity properties degrade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据