4.6 Article

Symbiotic bacteria, immune-like sentinel cells, and the response to pathogens in a social amoeba

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230727

关键词

sentinel cells; symbiosis; pathogens; Dictyostelium; Paraburkholderia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study investigated the impact of a bacterial endosymbiont on a multicellular social amoeba host. The results showed that the endosymbiont reduced and impaired the number and functionality of sentinel cells in the host, but also had a protective effect. This research expands our understanding of the complex relationship between the amoeba and the bacteria.
Some endosymbionts living within a host must modulate their hosts' immune systems in order to infect and persist. We studied the effect of a bacterial endosymbiont on a facultatively multicellular social amoeba host. Aggregates of the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum contain a subpopulation of sentinel cells that function akin to the immune systems of more conventional multicellular organisms. Sentinel cells sequester and discard toxins from D. discoideum aggregates and may play a central role in defence against pathogens. We measured the number and functionality of sentinel cells in aggregates of D. discoideum infected by bacterial endosymbionts in the genus Paraburkholderia. Infected D. discoideum produced fewer and less functional sentinel cells, suggesting that Paraburkholderia may interfere with its host's immune system. Despite impaired sentinel cells, however, infected D. discoideum were less sensitive to ethidium bromide toxicity, suggesting that Paraburkholderia may also have a protective effect on its host. By contrast, D. discoideum infected by Paraburkholderia did not show differences in their sensitivity to two non-symbiotic pathogens. Our results expand previous work on yet another aspect of the complicated relationship between D. discoideum and Paraburkholderia, which has considerable potential as a model for the study of symbiosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据