4.7 Article

Outage Analysis of Multicarrier Full-Duplex Cooperative UAV-to-UAV Communications System

期刊

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 1309-1313

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2023.3267950

关键词

Full-duplex radio; U2U communications; outage probability; SINR; OFDMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This letter proposes a multicarrier full-duplex (FD) cooperative UAV-to-UAV (U2U) communications system, where the UAV transmitter (UT) works as an FD relay for cellular uplink transmission and utilizes a portion of cellular subcarriers for its own transmission to the UAV receiver (UR). An analytical framework is utilized to derive cellular and U2U outage probabilities, and the results show that U2U communications with a substantial outage performance is feasible while maintaining a minimal cellular outage constraint.
Direct and reliable communications between unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) facilitate various promising technologies such as UAV-aided relaying, collision avoidance in UAV swarms, and UAV-assisted multi-access edge computing. Moreover, UAVs can act as aerial base stations to provide inexpensive rural and remote coverage. This letter proposes a multicarrier full-duplex (FD) cooperative UAV-to-UAV (U2U) communications system wherein the UAV transmitter (UT) works as an FD relay for cellular uplink transmission. In return, a portion of cellular subcarriers is utilized by UT for its own transmission to the UAV receiver (UR). An analytical framework incorporating the conventional height-dependent three-dimensional (3-D) channel model characterized by a large-scale path loss and a small-scale fading is utilized to derive cellular and U2U outage probabilities. The results demonstrate that U2U communications with a substantial outage performance is feasible while maintaining a minimal cellular outage constraint. Specifically, the U2U outage probability of the order 10(-7) can be achieved while maintaining the cellular outage constraint of 10(-3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据