4.5 Article

Magnetospheric Time History in Storm-Time Magnetic Flux Dynamics

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2023JA031832

关键词

interplanetary coronal mass ejection; magnetic flux; geomagnetic storm; space weather; storm sudden commencement; magnetospheric current systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetospheric magnetic flux dynamics in 29 geomagnetic storms between 2015 and 2019 were quantified using near-equatorial Van Allen Probe, GOES, and Magnetospheric Multiscale satellites. Concurrent, multi-probe observations were utilized for the first time to preserve magnetospheric time history. It was revealed that during storm sudden commencement (SSC), magnetic flux uniformly increased by 15% throughout the magnetosphere, except for a 30% decrease in the nightside inner magnetosphere, and during the storm main and recovery phases, there was a decrease of 30% and 15% respectively in the nightside magnetosphere.
Magnetospheric magnetic flux dynamics is quantified in 29 geomagnetic storms between 2015 and 2019, using near-equatorial Van Allen Probe, GOES, and Magnetospheric Multiscale satellites. For the first time, concurrent, multi-probe observations are utilized to preserve magnetospheric time history, defined as the state of the magnetosphere leading up to an observation. It is revealed that, relative to pre-storm conditions, (a) during the storm sudden commencement (SSC), magnetic flux uniformly increases ?? = +15% throughout the magnetosphere, except in the nightside inner magnetosphere where ?? = -30%, and (b) during storm main and recovery phases, ?? = -30% and -15%, respectively, in the nightside magnetosphere, at radial distances 5 = r [R-E] < 8. It is found that a symmetric ring current is likely formed in the nightside, early in the storm process (localized during SSC), which then broadens during the main phase, before weakening during the recovery phase. The current system on the dayside shows a distinct dawn-dusk asymmetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据